What is the safest distance from your 5G cell System?
If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. safe distance to live from cell phone tower could result in various possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further your location from the tower.
While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.
This study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. https://squareblogs.net/grousetwine12/what-lengths-can-you-get-from-your-5g-cell-phone-tower-without-getting-unsafe is also the largest organ of the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the effect on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.