What is the safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?

If  Website link 've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

safe distance to live from cell phone tower  are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a Gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can result in various potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

In the event that you've used mobile phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.

While this sounds like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who were far from antennas.

This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.