Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could result in many possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away you are from it.
While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers could be more vulnerable to health problems. For safe distance to live from cell phone tower , a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. what is a safe distance from a cell tower include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. what is a safe distance from a cell tower are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.