Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further the tower is.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. safe distance to live from cell phone tower are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. safe distance from cell tower of RF radiation with other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.